New Delhi, November 16, 2020: The Supreme Court had refused to entertain a plea seeking a bar on persons with criminal antecedents from contesting elections. The Supreme Court cannot direct Parliament to amend the Representation of the People Act, 1951 and force a declaration that persons who have been charge-sheeted should be disqualified from contesting elections.

The Supreme Court Bench comprising of Justices L. Nageswara Rao, Hemant Gupta & Ajay Rastogi said that the issue in the instant petition was the domain of the parliament and that it was open to the petitioner to pursue any remedy available for effectuating implementing directions issued by the Court earlier in this regard.

The Justice L Nageswara Rao-led bench said: “We agree that what you are saying is correct. But we cannot pass such orders. This is under the legislative domain of the Parliament.”

Lok Prahari, through its General Secretary, Advocate SN Shukla told the court that the issue before court was to declare the candidature of those persons null and void who have been chargesheeted by courts for over a year and have been convicted with imprisonment for over 5 years. "Election of such persons must declared null and void as under Section 100 of the Representation of Peoples Act," Shukla told the court.

The bench told Shukla that the exact question had been dealt with in the 2014 order passed by Justice RM Lodha which was then referred to the Law Commission.Shukla then cited the 2018 judgment which had directed necessary amendments to Form 26 of Rule 4A of the Conduct of Elections Rules of 1961 so as to require candidates to declare on affidavit theirs as well as their associates' sources of income.

In this context, Shukla told the court that no steps had been taken in terms of the judgment of top court in Public Interest Foundation of India V. UOI to ensure that persons with criminal background should not contest elections and that the number of persons with criminal antecedents have been increasing in the parliament.

No law has been brought into effect by the parliament despite recommendations and observations, Shukla said.

When the bench finally refused to entertain the petition, the petitioner remarked that the parliament would never ensure that such a law is passed. "Majority of the parliament has criminals. Law will never be passed because criminals have already passed the 33% mark in the Parliament," he said.

In 2018, a five-judge bench of the Supreme Court the Court delivered its judgement in the Electoral Disqualification case. The Court had to decide if persons ought to be disqualified from membership in legislative bodies when criminal charges are framed against them.

The court had unanimously decided that it cannot disqualify candidates, against whom criminal charges have been framed, from contesting elections, recognizing that it cannot introduce new rules regarding the disqualification of electoral candidates.

The Bench had then asked Parliament to make a law that prevents candidates accused of serious crimes from entering politics.

News Courtesy:PIB | Hindu| DC | LE | LI | LO | IE | LL | PTI |ht | ET | UNI | DNA | FP | Jurist |IndToday|

Disclaimer: Information, facts or opinions expressed in this news article are presented as sourced supplied by the concerned either as press release, press statement or via other source of information, websearch engines and internet and do not reflect views of Lawtime and hence Lawtime is not responsible or liable for the same. As a source and news provider, India info Comm Network's website Lawtime.in is not responsible for any of the copy right violation or for accuracy, completeness, suitability and validity of any information in this news article

Comments

Name*:
Phone number:
Email address*:
Comments and questions*:
Enter web form code*: reload image * - required fields.